Request a Quote
We operate with full and proactive measures to detect and report on Fraud and Money Laundering activities. We follow and apply strict processes as recommended by the Bold Legal Group comprising 650 conveyancing firms and the Conveyancing Association. Through these organisations we share intelligence on attempted fraud and money laundering activity.
Call for an instant quote: 01603 877067

Say 'no' to leasehold property

It goes against the grain to advise a client not to proceed with a property transaction, especially when the client has his or her heart set on purchasing the property. However, as a responsible legal advisor we need to be less afraid of saying ‘No’.

Leasehold property is attracting a lot of negative press of late, and is the focus, as we know, of Government attention. The temptation is to look at this as yet another ‘scare story, and one which, in time, will blow over. The reality is it is unlikely it will, and if anything, it is likely to get worse before we will see any improvement. It's therefore dangerous, and potentially negligent, for conveyancers to stick their head in the sand and ignore the many warning signs appearing on a daily basis.

Doubling rent review clauses and provision for rent increase at regular issues are presenting a major hurdle for those who are looking not only to buy, but also sell, leasehold properties. It was only yesterday that an estate agent called to enquire why we were advising a client to withdraw from a transaction when the agent was aware other properties in the same development had recently sold.

It is now recognised that it will be more difficult to sell a leasehold property which has a doubling ground-rent charge that rises after 10 years. This doubling of ground rent may have an impact on the marketability and mortgageability of the lease when selling or buying with such a clause. Some lenders may not agree to offer a mortgage on a property with a doubling ground rent. Nationwide has formally started declining mortgage offers which include a doubling ground rent clause.

At present its a lottery as to whether a lender faced with one of these clauses will be prepared to lend. In the light of this, and the ever-changing lender landscape, would it be sound advice to allow a client to purchase a property subject to a lease with one of these clauses? I would submit it would not, unless the lease could first be varied to remove the offending clause. Some conveyancers looking to avoid the delay and cost of seeking a lease variation, advise clients to take out indemnity insurance. I am not sure I agree with this because insurance only acts as a sticking plaster, and not as a cure. Furthermore, even if the lender is happy to accept insurance there is no guarantee that other lenders will be minded to accept the policy when it comes to sell / remortgage. Moreover, lender policy seems to be changing these days quicker than the wind.

There is also a danger of some conveyancers becoming too fixated on what the client’s lender is saying about the clause and ignoring in the process the best interests of the lay client. It is unsafe to assume that just because the lender is happy to proceed, that the client will also be content to continue. The client needs to be made aware of the dangers of purchasing a property with one of these clauses in the lease, and in my mind advised not to proceed with the transaction.

If the client disagrees then a letter setting out your advice should be sent and the client should be asked to confirm instructions in writing notwithstanding the advice. The client should be warned that this type of rent review clause may: be costly to the client as the rent increase (although as it gets more expensive this won't be during the clients life time); stop a future buyer from getting a mortgage as mortgage lenders do not like doubling ground rent clauses (it might even prevent the client from re-mortgaging); cause an issue on sale as the buyer doesn't want to buy a property with ground rent that doubles; or reduce the property's value (the ground rent liability makes the property less valuable).

This represents a serious issue for conveyancers, and until Government makes these clauses illegal, conveyancers should be saying ‘No’ more often than I fear is happening at present.

David Pett - Solicitor

01603 877066 or 01603 877067

Our phone lines are open Monday to Friday 9am-5pm. Please note our phone lines will however be closed for lunch between the hours of 1pm and 2pm.

company details
69 - 75 Thorpe Road,
Norwich, NR1 1UA
01603 877066 or 01603 877067
01603 230125
copyright © 2017 MJP Conveyancing. All Rights Reserved

*MJP Conveyancing LTD is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority – SRA No. 590889

MJP Conveyancing Ltd is a company registered in England and Wales Registered No: 8026741 VAT Number: 157917571. A full list of the directors is available upon request. We use the word 'Partner' to refer to a Director of the Limited Company, or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualification. Equality and Diversity Policy Equality and Diversity Policy Statement for Clients * - In calculating this we measure the average time it takes to reach the stage of exchange ( not the date you actually move in which is known as the completion date) from the date we receive the contract from the sellers solicitors or from when we send the contract to the buyers solicitors. This period can be longer when delays arise which are not within our control. We cannot guarantee that we can achieve this average turnaround time in all transactions. This turnaround time does not apply to leasehold and leasehold and new build transactions.
Cyber Essentials Cyber Essentials Plus